The purpose of the IRB review is to assist Radford researchers as they prepare a human subjects research protocol that is compliant with federal, state, and local regulations, Radford University policy, and ethical standards. IRB protocol review is based on federal regulations 45 CFR 46 and Radford IRB Policies & Procedures. Projects need to be submitted to the IRB for review when research involving human interaction is about a person or group and includes a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge(45 CFR 46.102.d).
For a detailed breakdown of whether your research may require IRB review or at what review category it should be submitted, please see the OHRP Human Subjects Regulations Decision Charts.
Radford University uses IRBManager for the online submission of new IRB applications, amendments to existing protocols, and protocol closures. IRBManager may be accessed under OneCampus, logging on using your Radford University email address and password, and searching for Research Compliance/IRBManager: IRB & IACUC. The IRBManager User Guidance Manual will help you get started. Please contact the Research Compliance Office if you have any additional questions as you work your way through your IRB application.
One of the questions frequently asked of the Radford University IRB office is, “When will my IRB protocol be reviewed?” or “How long will it take for my IRB protocol to be approved?” Protocols are reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis year-round. While the time for IRB review will vary, it typically takes 4-6 weeks from submission for the initial review of a protocol to occur.
Most protocol applications are not approved on their first submission due to information that is incomplete or needs clarification. It is important to remember to carefully read each question on the IRB application and respond to each question. Many times, an IRB application will be returned by the IRB office to the PI for revisions following IRB review due to an incomplete response(s) to questions in the IRB application or lack of required documents for the project.
In those cases, the Radford University IRB office will return the protocol to the PI for revisions. Once the revised application is received, the protocol application is again reviewed in the order it was received.
Please note: Until you receive final approval from the Radford University IRB office, you may not begin your research. This includes the recruitment of study participants.
Tip: A researcher may contact the Radford University IRB office to request an “expedited” review of their protocol. "Expedited" does not necessarily mean the review is fast. Rather, an expedited study is a technical term in the IRB world which means your study is no more than minimal risk and meets conditions found in 45 CFR 46.110.
Under expedited review, the review may be carried out by the IRB Chair or by one or more experienced IRB reviewers designated by the Chair. This review may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except this reviewer may not disapprove of the research. What the researcher may mean to say instead is, “Can you rush my protocol to the front of the review queue?” Unless the request will immediately affect a participant’s well-being, the answer is usually no. It is a matter of justice and equity for your fellow Radford University researchers who are also waiting for their protocol to be reviewed.
If your IRB application needs to be reviewed by the Full Board at a monthly meeting, the PI and student (if applicable) will be notified and sent an invitation to attend the meeting. While the PI and student do not need to attend the IRB meeting, the Board has found it helpful to resolve any outstanding points of clarification to provide an adequate review and assist the researcher in the review and approval process.
If the application is related to a student project and there are conflicts related to the ability of the PI/Radford University faculty member to attend the regularly scheduled IRB meeting, the IRB application may be deferred until the following month's IRB meeting to accommodate schedules.
• Is it research as defined by the federal regulations?
• Is it research with human subjects as defined by the federal regulations?
• Is Radford University engaged in research with human subjects as defined by the
federal regulations?
Is it Research?
45 CFR 46.102(l) defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
Is it Human Subjects Research?
45 CFR 46.102(e)(1) states a human subject is defined as a living individual about whom an investigator
conducting research:
• Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the
individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens (this includes
manipulation of the human’s environment)
• Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes or generates identifiable private information or
identifiable biospecimens.
Do I need IRB approval through Radford University?
If you are affiliated with Radford University and acting as a researcher for Radford University, you are considered an agent or an employee. As a result, your research project (even if you are a student) will need IRB approval through Radford University. This is done through submitting an IRB application to the Radford University IRB or if completing collaborative research, through requesting a Reliance Agreement/Institutional Authorization Agreement (IAA), where one IRB relies on the review and approval of another IRB.
An institution’s employees or agents refers to individuals who:
• act on behalf of the institution.
• exercise institutional authority or responsibility.
• perform institutionally designated activities.
Employees and agents can include staff, students, contractors, and volunteers, among others, regardless of whether the individual is receiving compensation.
Not Human Subjects Research (NHSR)
Not Human Subjects Research (NHSR) applications are used to determine if a project meets the regulatory definition of human subjects and/or research. When the IRB determines a project does NOT meet the regulatory definitions, a determination letter will be generated which states IRB approval is not required. If the IRB determines the project DOES meet the regulatory definitions, it will be reviewed normally as an IRB study application. NHSR determinations are made by the IRB and do not require a convened committee meeting.
Please submit your IRB application by filling out the IRBManager xForm and selecting "Not Human Subjects Research (NHSR Determination" in the "Type of Study" section of the IRBManager application.
Quality improvement activities (that are not considered human subjects research)
Human subjects research is reviewed by the IRB according to the following categories:
Research can be approved as “exempt” if it is no more than “minimal risk” and fits into one of the exempt review categories as defined by the Federal regulations 45 CFR 46. All Exempt studies MUST be submitted to the Radford University IRB for review. Exempt reviews are conducted by a member of the IRB committee and do not require a convened committee meeting. These are reviewed individually as they are received. For further information, please contact the IRB Office at 540-831-5290 or irb-iacuc@radford.edu.
The following types of research are commonly processed under exempt review:
Not Eligible for Exemption
Federal regulations mandating IRB review recognize that not all research rises to the level of full board review. In some cases, a protocol needs IRB approval but the level of risk in the protocol is considered minimal and the review can be expedited. If the proposed research meets the definition for minimal risk, in addition to one of the federally designated review categories, the IRB can expedite a protocol's review. Expedited reviews are conducted by a member of the IRB committee and do not require a convened meeting. 45 CFR 46.102(j) defines minimal risk as "the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine or psychological examinations or tests."
Certain types of research may be reviewed and approved under an expedited procedure. In order to qualify for expedited review, research activities must present no more than minimal risk to human subjects and involve only procedures listed in one or more of the categories listed below. Learn more about the different levels of IRB review, here.
Summary of Expedited Review Categories
Research that does not qualify for exempt or expedited review, presenting more than minimal risk to subjects, will receive a review at a fully convened IRB committee meeting. The research requires approval from a majority of those members.
Examples of Full Board Research
Research involving greater than minimal risk procedures and:
Expedited categories one (1) through seven (7) below pertain to both initial and continuing IRB review, while categories (8) and (9) apply in certain cases to research already approved by the full board.
If your IRB application needs to be reviewed by the Full Board at the monthly meeting, the PI and student (if applicable) will be notified and sent an invitation to attend the meeting. While it is not mandatory for the PI and student to attend the IRB meeting, the Board has found it helpful to resolve any outstanding points of clarification to provide an adequate review and assist the researcher in the review and approval process.
If the application is related to a student project and there are conflicts related to the ability of the PI/Radford University faculty member to attend the regularly scheduled IRB meeting, the IRB application may be deferred until the next month's IRB meeting to accommodate schedules.
We are here to help and ask that you reach out to the Research Compliance Office with any questions you may have.
The Radford University IRB convenes on the third Monday of each month. Exceptions to this may be in the Summer months and /or the holiday season. For more information about meeting dates and deadlines, please see the Meeting Dates & Deadlines page.
Course projects usually do not lead to generalizable knowledge and are often not undertaken with specific research goals in mind. These projects do not need Radford University IRB approval UNLESS they:
Classroom exercises DO NOT include Independent studies or other individualized research activities and does not apply for independent or directed studies, dissertations, theses, honors theses, capstone projects, or any other individualized learning experience.
Please contact the IRB Office PROMPTLYif you have any questions about your proposed project.
It is the responsibility of the faculty advisors to ensure that course projects are conducted to the standards of their relevant discipline. See the appliable policy prior to implementing a project that may qualify as a Classroom Exercise project.
Please read and review the optional Classroom Exercise Agreement [PDF] may be used between student and instructor to ensure that the criteria are appropriately discussed and understood.
One of the questions frequently asked of the Radford University IRB office is, “When will my IRB protocol be reviewed?” or “How long will it take for my IRB protocol to be approved?”
Protocols are reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis year-round. While the time for IRB review will vary, it typically takes 4-6 weeks from submission to approval of a protocol to occur. We ask that you plan accordingly.
Many times, an IRB application will be returned by the IRB office to the PI for revisions following IRB review due to an incomplete response(s) to questions in the IRB application or lack of required documents for the project. It is important to remember to carefully read each question on the IRB application and respond to each question.
In those cases, the Radford University IRB office will return the protocol to the PI for revisions. Once revisions are submitted, the protocol application is again reviewed in the order it was received.
A researcher may contact the Radford University IRB office to request an “expedited” review of their protocol. Please note, that this does not necessarily mean the review is fast.
Expedited review is a procedure through which certain kinds of research may be reviewed and approved without convening a meeting of the IRB. The IRB regulations permit, but do not require, an IRB to review certain categories of research found in 45 CFR 46.110, through an expedited procedure if the research involves no more than minimal risk.
Under expedited review, the review may be carried out by the IRB Chair or by one or more experienced IRB reviewers designated by the Chair. This review may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except this reviewer may not disapprove of the research.
For more information about the different levels of IRB review, take a look under the IRB Review /Levels of Review section of the IRB webpage.
What the researcher may mean to say instead is, “Can you rush my protocol to the front of the review queue?” Unless the request will immediately affect a participant’s well-being, the answer is usually no. It is a matter of justice and equity for your fellow Radford University researchers who are also waiting for their protocol to be reviewed.
Full Board protocols must be submitted by the cut-off date listed under Meeting Dates & Deadlines to be considered for review at the next convened IRB meeting, dependent on meeting the requirements for a quorum. Please have your pre-review comments submitted at least 1 week prior to the meeting date so the IRB has an updated protocol to review. Please plan on at least 6 weeks for IRB review of protocols reviewed by the Full Board.
The Radford University IRB will make every attempt to streamline the approval process while still evaluating and ensuring the protection of human subjects involved in the research. Researchers are encouraged to contact the Research Compliance Manager with any questions or concerns about the IRB review process.
Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
45 CFR 46.114(b)(1) states that any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States.
Note: Effective January 25, 2018, the National Institutes of Health mandated the use of single IRBs as a contingency for funding of multi-center studies.
A reliance agreement (i.e. IAA’s, IIA, etc.) is an agreement between two or more institutions that allows an institution’s IRB to rely on another, unrelated institution’s IRB for review of human subjects’ research. A reliance agreement comes in multiple formats, with the most common being Institutional Authorization Agreements (IAA), Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and Master Reliance Agreement (MRA). An Investigator working at multiple institutions, each having their own IRB, may decide to have one IRB serve as the IRB of record for some or all participating sites. This practice is commonly referred to as ceded review, reliance agreements, or deferral of IRB oversight.
In some cases, the Radford University IRB will either serve as the reviewing IRB (IRB of Record) or will cede oversight (rely upon) of the research activity to another equally qualified institution’s IRB. Each individual IRB will indicate which agreement format is appropriate for a specific study.
Under a Master Agreement with Carilion Clinic effective Fall 2020, Radford University cedes authority for IRB review for students with IRB projects involving students and/or patients at Carilion Clinic. These human subjects research projects will undergo the Carilion Clinic's IRB review process with a Carilion Clinic faculty member as PI for the project. Following approval of the IRB protocol, a copy of the IRB approved protocol, approval letter, and corresponding documents shall be sent to Radford’s Research Compliance Office for documentation purposes.
For other collaborative projects please contact the Research Compliance Office for the IRB Authorization Agreement (IAA) to be completed. Submission of the completed IAA along with a copy of the IRB-approved protocol, approval letter, and corresponding approved materials from your University's IRB or Exemption letter received is needed. The IRB Office will review the submitted documents and contact you either for any more information that might be required or with approval information that you may begin your project.
Recruitment materials should include:
Acceptable:
Unacceptable:
Elements That Are Not Allowed:
Tips for recruitment materials:
Radford University requires that applications for human subjects research specify the number of participants to be enrolled in the research study. The Radford IRB requires the submission of a modification or amendment to increase the approved sample size of the proposal.
When the approval is issued, approval is granted to enroll only the number of participants listed in the application. Your IRB approval letter will state the number of study subjects are approved to be enrolled.
The number of study subjects approved is the number of participants who enroll in the project and NOT the number of subjects with usable data for analysis.
Once this number is reached, enrollment must cease. A modification/amendment must be submitted to the IRB to increase subject numbers.
In cases where researchers enroll more subjects than the number approved, data from the over-enrolled subjects must be discarded. Keep in mind, the IRB does not give retroactive approval for those subjects who have already been enrolled over the approved number.
To reduce the likelihood of over-enrolling subjects, you are encouraged to monitor carefully, the number of subjects recruited and be prepared to amend your protocols to increase sample size before the maximum approved subject number has been reached.
Example: Enrolled number of subjects past the approved number - The IRB protocol was approved for enrollment of 150 study participants and 175 participants were enrolled. Data collected for study subjects 151 through 175 may not be used.
Tip: For research studies using Qualtrics for surveys: Remember to set enrollment limits in the parameters of your study.